Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is slightly better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a 77.6 score against 73.9. Even though HTC U11 is incredibly older than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, it's body is a lot lighter and thinner. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM.
HTC U11 counts with a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures much better pictures and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has better video frame rates, a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a very superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.