Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a score of 78.6, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's global score of 73.9. Even though the LG V10 is older than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, it's construction is a little thinner and lighter. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a better performance than LG V10, because it has more RAM and more processing cores.
LG V10 counts with a better looking screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. LG V10 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a much better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 36% more battery size. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a superior camera than LG V10, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.