Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 global score. LG V30S ThinQ's design is lighter and extremely thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though it was released around a year before. The LG V30S ThinQ features a little sharper display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit faster processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 2 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and video, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a camera in the back with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features greater battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 23% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.