Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is way lighter and thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although it was released around 12 months before. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and LG V35 ThinQ count with very similar processors, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a way bigger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and faster video frame rates.
LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4065mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.