Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 global score. The LG V40 ThinQ body is way lighter and thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though they were released with only a few months difference. LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
LG V40 ThinQ features a processing unit that is very similar to the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom one, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V40 ThinQ has more storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.