Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 score. LG Velvet's design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM.
LG Velvet has a display that's just as good as the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom one, although the LG Velvet also has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a quite higher screen pixel density. LG Velvet counts with a much better memory for applications and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom shoots just a bit better photos and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has higher video frame rates and a bigger aperture.
LG Velvet counts with a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.