Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Green | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a general score of 83.4 against 73.9. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is incredibly newer, just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a quite better number of pixels in each screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's memory for games and applications is just as good as OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's one, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.