Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Green | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a 78.5 score against 73.9. The Motorola One Action construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though they were released only a couple of months apart. The Motorola One Action features a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little bit better pixels density.
Motorola One Action features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes much better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger diafragm aperture, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and faster video frame rate. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.