Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Green | Blue and Brown |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is slightly better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a score of 80.7 against 73.9. Although Motorola One Vision and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released with only 1 months difference, Motorola One Vision is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Motorola One Vision has a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
Motorola One Vision features a slightly better memory for applications and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a same size sensor, a same size camera aperture, a same resolution back facing camera and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has better video frame rates. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features improved battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.