Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with an 81.3 score against 73.9. Galaxy A31 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A31 and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom count with quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A31 has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite greater pixel number in each inch of screen. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and the same resolution back camera, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a way higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy A31 has longer battery life than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4065mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.