Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 has a general score of 79.6, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's overall score of 73.9. Even when Galaxy A40 and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released with only 2 months difference, Galaxy A40 is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A40 has a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A40 also counts with a just a bit better pixels count per inch of display.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A40, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4065mAh battery capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a way bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures, a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.