Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having an 83.8 score against 73.9. Although Samsung Galaxy A50 and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were only released 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A50 is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a screen that is just as good as the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 2% more battery size. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.