Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 global score. Although the Galaxy A50s and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released only 4 months apart, the Galaxy A50s is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50s and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom feature quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50s has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of display. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size camera sensor and the same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and better video frame rate.
Galaxy A50s features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.