Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with an 85.5 score against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy A51 body is thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although both were released only a couple months apart. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a screen that is just as good as the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a 48 mega-pixels back camera, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.