Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a 90.8 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is newer, somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom count with similar screens, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4065mAh. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, a same size camera sensor and the same video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.