Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is way better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a score of 90.7 against 73.9. Galaxy A52 is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. Galaxy A52 has a screen that is very similar to OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's display, because although the Galaxy A52 has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite better screen pixel density.
Galaxy A52 features a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 features a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.