Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having a 91.3 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a display that's very similar to the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom one, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better camera than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.