Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Green | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is way better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a overall score of 91.1 against 73.9. The Galaxy A52s is a noticeably newer device, and it is also thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. Galaxy A52s and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom feature extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52s has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little better pixel amount per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has more storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a little better performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52s has just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity. Galaxy A52s shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot better resolution camera and a larger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.