Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 score. The Galaxy A70 construction is lighter and thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even when both of them were released only 2 months apart. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little smaller display. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has better video frame rate and a much bigger camera sensor.
The Galaxy A70 features just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A70 has just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.