Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having a score of 87.5 against 73.9. Galaxy A71's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although they were released with only 8 months difference. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite inferior pixels quantity in each inch of display and a little smaller screen.
The Galaxy A71 features a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a much more MP camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.