Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a 92.9 score against 73.9. The Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Galaxy A71 5G UW have very similar screens, although the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a quite bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite greater count of pixels in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a better storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4065mAh. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.