Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Green | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having an 85.2 score against 73.9. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though they were only released with a few months difference. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit bigger display. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has better video frame rates, a much bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.