Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Green | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has an overall score of 85.2, which is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's score of 73.9. Galaxy F41 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy F41 has a way better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4065mAh. Galaxy F41 counts with a bit better camera than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.