Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's global score of 73.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released with only 4 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is much heavier but also way thinner. The Galaxy Fold has just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Fold features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior battery life than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 4065mAh. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.