Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Green | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a 78.9 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy M20's design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even when both were released with only 4 months difference. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features longer battery performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.