Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a score of 85 against 73.9. The Galaxy M40 design is somewhat thinner and much lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though both of them were released with only 0 months difference. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Samsung Galaxy M40 both count with very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy M40 has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy M40 has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, higher video frame rates and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.