Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a score of 87.7 against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but both of them are equally thin. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M51 takes a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy M51 counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a way better battery performance than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.