Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a 98.9 score against 73.9. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is newer, thinner and a little lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processing unit than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a greater amount of pixels per display inch, a little larger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little longer battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.