Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting an 81.2 score against 73.9. Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older phone than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but Samsung was able to make it noticeably lighter and thinner anyway. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a quite lower display pixel density and a quite smaller display. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much larger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features greater battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4065mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.