Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's global score of 73.9. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an a lot older cellphone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a better performing processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy Note 5 features a much better display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a bigger camera aperture, better video frame rates and a much larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.