Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a general score of 80.4 against 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although it was released 2 years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 27 percent larger battery capacity. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos, faster video frame rate and a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.