Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting an 89 score against 73.9. Galaxy Note10 is a a lot lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, although they were released with only 2 months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a screen that's very similar to the screen in OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density.
The Galaxy Note10 and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom count with really similar processors, they have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.