Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a score of 86.2 against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though both of them were released with only a couple months difference. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a display that's just as good as OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's screen, although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch of display. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features more storage to install games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.