Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having a score of 77.7 against 73.9. Galaxy Note3's body is extremely lighter and thinner than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little more pixels per display inch, a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger aperture.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features better battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.