Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a general score of 80.2 against 73.9. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note5 is much older than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, it's body is extremely lighter and thinner. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4065mAh battery size. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a superior camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger camera aperture, a back camera with much more megapixels, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.