Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's global score of 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is an older phone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but Samsung made it much lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a little better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and more RAM.
The Galaxy Note7 features just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.