Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black and Green | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting an 83 score against 73.9. The Galaxy Note8 is an older cellphone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit thinner and a little lighter. Galaxy Note8 has a slightly better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a better display pixel density.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4065mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a way more MP camera in the back and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.