Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Green | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a a lot lighter and somewhat thinner phone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though both were released with only a couple months difference. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better pixel count in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy S10 has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 features a CPU that is very similar to the processor in OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, both have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much larger sensor.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has improved battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4065mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.