Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Green | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a global score of 93.6 against 73.9. Galaxy S10 5G's design is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even when they were released with only 1 months difference. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G both count with extremely similar CPUs, they have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch of display, a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a bit larger display. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels back camera.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Galaxy S10 5G have really similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal internal memory. Galaxy S10 5G has a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4065mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.