Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Green | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy S10e and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy S10e is thinner and incredibly lighter. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Samsung Galaxy S10e have quite similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10e has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4065mAh battery capacity against 3100mAh. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.