Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is way better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 general score. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S20 and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released with only 9 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy S20 has a little bit better display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S20 has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.