Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, having a general score of 98 against 73.9. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and OPPO Reno 10x Zoom were released with only 9 months difference, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is just a little heavier but also just a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has better battery duration than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4065mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior camera than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 MP resolution and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.