Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Green | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is much better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a 93.4 score against 73.9. The Galaxy S22 body is extremely newer, thinner and way lighter than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much more vibrant display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit better processor than Galaxy S22. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better camera than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4065mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.