Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is way better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 general score. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit heavier than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, it's a little thinner and notably newer. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features just a little better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a little bit larger display and a better display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a way better 108 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher video definition.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has improved battery life than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.