Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-12 | -- |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Black and Green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a score of 82.6 against 73.9. Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and much thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a really superior performance than Galaxy S25. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more vivid display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a just a little greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with a better resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has more internal memory. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.