Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-12 | -- |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Black and Green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, getting a 90.7 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much thinner and much lighter phone than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has a better display pixels density, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way better video definition, a lot larger sensor taking way better quality pictures and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra have similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.