Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-06-12 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Green | Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 global score. Galaxy S5 Sport is an a lot older phone than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but it is lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more cpu cores and 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a brighter display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels in each inch of display. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way better resolution camera, faster video frame rate and a lot bigger aperture for better low-light captures.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.