Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's general score of 73.9. The Samsung Galaxy S7 body is a lot lighter and thinner than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, even though it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid screen than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each display inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, higher video frame rate and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has 4065mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.