Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Green | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a global score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom's 73.9 score. Although the Galaxy S7 Active is extremely older and just a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, it's body is still somewhat lighter. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has faster video frame rate and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4065mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.