Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| 2019-06-12 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and Green | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4065mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is much better than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, with a overall score of 81.7 against 73.9. The Galaxy S8 is an much older phone than the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a slightly better looking display than OPPO Reno 10x Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher pixel number in each inch of screen. OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno 10x Zoom features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity. The OPPO Reno 10x Zoom has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno 10x Zoom also has a lot more megapixels back camera, a much bigger camera sensor and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.